E ects of Liraglutide on Myocardial Function After Cardiac

Preparing to load PDF file. please wait...

0 of 0
100%
E ects of Liraglutide on Myocardial Function After Cardiac

Transcript Of E ects of Liraglutide on Myocardial Function After Cardiac

Journal of
Clinical Medicine
Article
Effects of Liraglutide on Myocardial Function After Cardiac Surgery: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomised Controlled GLOBE Trial
Abraham H. Hulst 1,2,3,† , Maarten J. Visscher 1,†, Thomas G. V. Cherpanath 4, Lieke van de Wouw 1, Marc B. Godfried 2, Bram Thiel 2, Bastiaan M. Gerritse 3, Thierry V. Scohy 3, R. Arthur Bouwman 5 , Mark G. A. Willemsen 5, Markus W. Hollmann 1, J. Hans DeVries 6, Benedikt Preckel 1,* and Jeroen Hermanides 1
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Postbus 22660, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] (A.H.H.); [email protected] (M.J.V.); [email protected] (L.v.d.W.); [email protected] (M.W.H.); [email protected] (J.H.)
2 Department of Anesthesiology, OLVG, Oosterpark 9, 1091 AC Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected] (M.B.G.); [email protected] (B.T.)
3 Department of Anesthesiology, Amphia, Molengracht 21, 4818 CK Breda, The Netherlands; [email protected] (B.M.G.); [email protected] (T.V.S.)
4 Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Postbus 22660, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected]
5 Department of Anesthesiology, Catharina Hospital, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands; [email protected] (R.A.B.); [email protected] (M.G.A.W.)
6 Department of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Postbus 22660, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; [email protected]
* Correspondence: [email protected] † Authors contributed equally.
Received: 18 February 2020; Accepted: 27 February 2020; Published: 2 March 2020
Abstract: Introduction: Previous studies demonstrated the cardioprotective properties of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with diabetes or cardiac disease. We investigated whether preoperative subcutaneous liraglutide improves myocardial function after cardiac surgery. Methods: We performed a pre-planned secondary analysis of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery included in the GLOBE trial. Patients were randomised to receive 0.6 mg subcutaneous liraglutide on the evening before surgery and 1.2 mg after induction of anaesthesia, or matching placebo. Perioperative echocardiographic assessments, haemodynamic parameters, doses of vasoactive inotropic support and postoperative measurements of troponin, Creatine Kinase-MB , creatinine and lactate were compared between groups. Results: The study population consisted of the entire intention-to-treat cohort of the GLOBE trial. In this study, 129 patients received liraglutide and 132 patients placebo. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Postoperatively, 170 (65%) patients underwent echocardiography. In the liraglutide group, more patients had a normal left ventricular systolic function (68%, 59 patients) compared to placebo (53%, 44 patients), difference = 15%, 95%CI = 0–30, p = 0.049. Assessment of the right ventricle revealed no difference in function. Conclusions: Patients receiving short-term preoperative liraglutide treatment better maintained normal myocardial function after cardiac surgery. This study warrants further evaluation of the potential beneficial effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists in cardiac surgery patients.
Keywords: liraglutide; placebo; randomised controlled trial; Troponin; CK-MB; left ventricular function; echocardiography; cardiac function

J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 673; doi:10.3390/jcm9030673

www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm

J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 673

2 of 9

1. Introduction
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) improve perioperative glucose regulation, without increasing the incidence of hypoglycaemia compared to insulin [1]. In addition, various cardioprotective mechanisms have been attributed to GLP-1RAs. We recently reported that two preoperative subcutaneous injections of liraglutide (a long-acting GLP-1RA) improved glycaemic control during cardiac surgery (GLOBE trial) [2]. In this secondary analysis of the GLOBE trial, we aimed to evaluate the effect of liraglutide on postoperative cardiac function through analysis of postoperative echocardiography, haemodynamic parameters, and routinely collected biomarkers of cardiac injury.
GLP-1 has been reported to increase myocardial metabolic efficiency of glucose usage, reduce systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance and activate ischaemic preconditioning pathways [3–5]. However, these mechanisms have mainly been demonstrated in animal studies, while there are only a few physiological studies in humans [6]. Some indications of positive GLP-1 mediated effects on cardiac function were observed in clinical studies, showing an improved left ventricular function and reduced infarct size after ischaemic injury in GLP-1 treated subjects [7–9]. These results were mainly seen in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing dobutamine stress testing or percutaneous coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction and were assessed at a limited interval after the intervention (up to 72 h) [6]. More recently, longer-term treatment with liraglutide was shown to reduce the incidence of major cardiovascular complications in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [10,11].
From the dataset of a recently reported multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, trial, wherein we administered a long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist, liraglutide, to patients undergoing cardiac surgery, we here report a pre-planned secondary analysis of indicators of cardiac function collected in routine clinical care. Based on the aforementioned studies, we hypothesised that liraglutide, compared to placebo, improves postoperative cardiac function.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
This study is a secondary analysis of the GLOBE trial, a multicentre, triple-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3, randomised superiority clinical trial which ran in four Dutch tertiary care centres. The primary hypothesis of the GLOBE trial was that the preoperative administration of liraglutide reduces the number of patients requiring insulin for glycaemic control during cardiac surgery. The trial was registered with www.trialregister.nl, number NTR6323. The study protocol was approved by the medical ethics committee of the Amsterdam UMC (registration number: 2017_012) before initiation of the trial. The detailed study protocol is available open access [12], and the primary results of the GLOBE trial have recently been published [2]. The relevant methodology concerning this cardiac analysis is described below. We wrote this paper in adherence to the CONSORT recommendations for reporting of randomised trials [13].
2.2. Participants
Patients planned to undergo elective cardiac surgery aged between 18 and 80 years were eligible for inclusion. We excluded patients with type 1 diabetes, current treatment with insulin >0.5 IU/kg daily, GLP-1 RAs, or corticosteroids, history of heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III and IV) [on 6 November 2017, this was amended to NYHA class IV only, after an update in the summary of products characteristics of liraglutide]), impaired renal function (creatinine ≥133 µmol/L for men and ≥115 µmol/L for women), allergies to trial products, history of pancreatic surgery, acute or chronic pancreatitis, personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, and (possibly) pregnant or breastfeeding women. All participants had to provide written informed consent before any trial-related procedures.

J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 673

3 of 9

2.3. Randomisation and Masking
At each institution, central research pharmacists allocated patients after on-line randomisation through an electronic data management system. Randomisation was balanced (1:1), with variable random blocks of four, six, or eight patients, and stratified per centre and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The research pharmacy distributed study medication in visually identical pen-injectors, equal in appearance and weight (provided by Novo Nordisk) directly to trained research personnel, responsible for the administration of the study medication. All patients, care providers, and study personnel were thus blinded to treatment allocation.
2.4. Procedures
Patients received a first subcutaneous injection with liraglutide 0.6 mg (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) or placebo on the evening before surgery (after 15:00 h) and a second dose of 1.2 mg or placebo was given after the induction of anaesthesia. Starting with the induction of anaesthesia and lasting until transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU), researchers measured blood glucose concentrations every hour; an intravenous insulin bolus injection algorithm was used for targeting intra-operative blood glucose concentrations between 4.0–8.0 mmol/L [12]. After transfer to the ICU, study interventions stopped, and further treatment, including blood glucose management, was left to the discretion of the ICU physician.
2.5. Data collection and Outcomes
Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, perioperative haemodynamic data and glycaemic control were recorded per study protocol as reported previously [2]. Echocardiography was performed as part of routine perioperative care by the treating cardiologist. We collected transthoracic echocardiographic assessments before, and up to thirty days after surgery. In case of multiple investigations, we recorded the assessment closest to the day of surgery. We recorded qualitative assessment (categorised as normal, or mildly, moderately or severely reduced function) of right and left ventricular function as noted by the echocardiographer. We recorded heart rate, heart rhythm and mean arterial pressure from the continuous recordings stored in the patient electronic health records from the start of surgery until 24 h after surgery, or discharge of the patients from the ICU, whichever occurred first. Data were recorded at predefined time-points; at start of surgery, end of surgery, and 1, 6, 12, and 18 h thereafter. Noted measurements were the means of the three values before, at, and after the respective time points. From the ICU electronic health records, we also noted the total dose of norepinephrine, dobutamine, milrinone, and amiodarone administered in the first 48 postoperative hours. In all participating centres, as part of routine clinical care, either Creatine Kinase-MB (CK-MB) or Troponin T levels were recorded postoperatively until two consecutive measurements showed a decline in these markers of cardiac injury. Hence, periods between these measurements varied, and we, therefore, analysed peak postoperative values in the first 24 h. We also noted lactate levels in this period, and creatinine measurements obtained up to five days after surgery.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
The sample size was defined by the number of patients included in the intention to treat analysis of the GLOBE trial [2]. Discrete data are presented as count (%) and compared between groups using χ2 tests or Fisher’s exact test. Continuous variables are presented as mean (SD) or median (IQR) and compared using Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U tests, depending on the distribution of the data. Absolute differences between groups are presented with the respective 95% CIs. Normality of distributions was assessed visually with histograms, Q-Q plots, and the Shapiro-Wilk test. All statistical tests were 2-sided, and a p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 26, IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA).

J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 673

4 of 9

2.7. Role of the Funding Source
The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit.

3. Results
The cohort of patients consists of all 261 patients included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis of the GLOBE trial. Of these, 129 patients were allocated to the liraglutide group and 132 to the placebo group. Baseline characteristics were well balanced and are summarised in Table 1. In this trial we observed that patients treated with liraglutide required less insulin for glycaemic control during surgery, compared to placebo, and also had lower glucose concentrations during surgery and ICU admittance [2].

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the intention-to-treat population.

All

Liraglutide

Placebo

261

129

132

Age, mean (SD), years Male sex, No. (%) ASA score III, No. (%) Smoker past year, No. (%) Hypertension, No. (%) BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 Diabetes mellitus type 2, No. (%) Creatinine clearance, mean (SD), mL/min Glycated haemoglobin, mean (SD), mmol/mol EuroSCORE II, median (IQR), % Left ventricular function < 50%, No. (%) Type of surgery, No. (%)
CABG-only procedure Single non-CABG procedure Combined procedures Duration of surgery, median (IQR), min Type of anaesthesia maintenance, No. (%) Propofol Sevoflurane

65.0 (10.9) 211 (81) 189 (72) 54 (21) 111 (43) 27.5 (4.2) 42 (16) 80.4 (16.6) 40 (8.9) 1.27 (0.89–1.97) 64 (25)
92 (35) 102 (39) 67 (26) 222 (165–293)
16 (6) 245 (94)

64.6 (11.2) 105 (81) 94 (73) 26 (20) 57 (44) 27.3 (4.0) 21 (16) 80.6 (17.0) 40 (9.7) 1.22 (0.84–1.93) 34 (26)
46 (36) 52 (40) 31 (24) 222 (162–276)
8 (6) 121 (94)

65.3 (10.7) 106 (80) 95 (72) 28 (21) 54 (43) 27.7 (4.4) 21 (16) 80.2 (16.2) 40 (8.1) 1.34 (0.90–2.05) 30 (23)
46 (35) 50 (38) 36 (27) 219 (169–308)
8 (6) 124 (94)

There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups for any of the baseline characteristics. ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists, CABG = Coronary artery bypass surgery.

3.1. Echocardiography
Preoperative echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function was reported for all included patients; however, postoperatively echocardiography was available in only 65% (170) of patients. Echocardiography was performed at a median of 4 days (IQR 3-5) after surgery. Baseline characteristics of the cohorts with and without an available echocardiographic assessment revealed no significant differences, except for the type of surgery; patients without postoperative echocardiography underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)-only procedures in 77% of cases, while this procedure-type comprised only 20% of the cohort that had an echocardiography postoperatively (Supplementary Material). Assessment of right and left ventricular function preoperatively and within 30 days after surgery are visualised in Figure 1. While left ventricular systolic function was comparable between groups preoperatively, we observed a higher rate of patients with a normal left ventricular systolic function in the liraglutide group compared to the placebo group (liraglutide: 59 patients (68%) vs placebo: 44 patients (53%), difference = 15% (95% CI 0–30, p = 0.049)). We observed no difference in right ventricular function.

plsaycsetbooligcrfouunpct(iloirnagwluatsidceo:m59pparaatibelnetsbe(6tw8%ee)nvsgprolaucpesbop:r4e4oppeartiaetnivtsel(y5,3%w)e, doibfsfeerrevnecde a= 1h5ig%he(9r5r%atCe Iof 0–p3a0t,ipen=ts0.0w4i9th)).aWneoormbsaelrvleefdt nveondtrififceurleanrcseyisntorliigchftuvnecnttiorincuilnarthfuenlcirtiaognlu. tide group compared to the

placebo group (liraglutide: 59 patients (68%) vs placebo: 44 patients (53%), difference = 15% (95% CI

0–30, p = 0.049)). We observed no difference in right ventricular function.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 673

5 of 9

Figure 1. Echocardiographic assessment of cardiac function before and after surgery, percentage of
patFieignutsr.eR1V. E=crhigohctarvdeinotgrircalpe,hLicVa=ssleesftsmveennttriocflec.ardiac function before and after surgery, percentage of Fpiagtuierent1s. ERcVh=ocrairgdhitovgeranptrhiciclea, sLsVes=smleefnt tveonf tcraicrldei.ac function before and after surgery, percentage of
3.2. Haepmatoiednytnsa. mRVics= right ventricle, LV = left ventricle. 3.2. Haemodynamics Continuous measurement of heart rate, heart rhythm, and mean arterial pressure from the start
of3s.2u.rHgCeareoymnoftodinryunuoapmusitcosm1e8ashuraefmterensturogfehryeawrteraetea,vahielabrtlerhfoyrth8m1%, a(n2d12m) oefanpaatriteenrtisal(Fpirgeusrseur2e).frMomeanthe postaorptCeoroafntistviunerughoeeuraysrtmfroaertaesuuwpraetsmosei1gn8nt ihofifcahafneteatrlrytsrhuairtggehe,erhryeianwrttehrrheylaitrhvamagill,uaatbnilddeemfgoreroau8n1pa%,rwte(i2rtih1a2la)phoreefasprstuartraieetenfrtoosfm(8F3tihg(e±u1sr1eta) r2t). beoaMftses/uamnrignpeorcysotmofopprearuraeptdivttoeoh178e7ahr(±t a1rf1at)teerinwsutahrsegseipgrlynaciwfiebceaornegtalryovuahipilga, hb(delerififfnoerrteh8ne1c%elir=a(2g61l;u29)t5id%oef CpgrIaot3iue–pn8,tswp (ier8ip3a%llap)crewebsiotshugorrueotuastpta, tn(idystifiocffeartllehynesctieigm=nei6fip;c9oa5inn%ttdsC.ifAIfe3tr–ee8nv,cepersyaat8it3e%annt)sywroeitfchetoihvueetdtsitmnatoeirspetipociainnlletysp.shAirgitnnieefiv,ce7ar%nyt (pd1oi9ffs)etodreponebcrueatstaibvmeeitnwtieme,een anpdthoie7n%gt,rom(u1op8s)st (pmFaiitglirueinnretos2nh)e.a.OdTnshitenhuensuIrCmhUybt,eh7rm4%o(f>(81p39a%2t)ie)onwftpsitahrtoeieucnettisvstiarnetgicsetivivcaeasdlolyancsotirigevnpeii/fniinceoapnthrtrodipniiefcf,e7sr%uenp(cp1e9os)rbtdeoatbwnudeteatnmhteihnee, regsaprnoeductpi7vs%e(Fd(i1og8sue)rsemo2if)lrd. iOinffonenrteh.netITdChrUueg,ns7u4dm%idb(ne1r9o2to)dfoipfffaeptraiebtineetnwstsreeercenecgievrivioneugdpsvna(oSsruoepapcipntlieevpmeh/eirnniontater,oy7p%Mica(1steu9r)piadploo).brtutaanmdinthe,e
arnedspe7c%tiv(e18d)osmesilroifndoniffee.reTnhtednruugmsbdeird onfotpdaitffieenrtbsertweceeeivninggrouvpasso(aScutpivpel/eimnoetnrotapriyc Msuapteproiarlt).and the respective doses of different drugs did not differ between groups (Supplementary Material).

3.3. Biomarkers

Figure 2. Perioperative haemodynamic measurements. Figure 2. Perioperative haemodynamic measurements.

To monitor postopFeirgautirvee2. mPeyrioocpaerrdatiiavle hisacehmaoedmyinaa,moicnme eoasfurtehme efnotsu.r involved centres used troponin measurements (48 patients) while the other three centres measured CK-MB postoperatively (213 patients). Peak values of both markers revealed no significant differences between the liraglutide and placebo group (Figure 3). Likewise, we found no between-group difference in peak and mean
lactate and creatinine levels (Supplementary Material).

3.3. Biomarkers
To monitor postoperative myocardial ischaemia, one of the four involved centres used troponin measurements (48 patients) while the other three centres measured CK-MB postoperatively (213 patients). Peak values of both markers revealed no significant differences between the liraglutide and placebo group (Figure 3). Likewise, we found no between-group difference in peak and mean lactate
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 673
and creatinine levels (Supplementary Material).

6 of 9

Figure 3. Postoperatively measured biomarkers, peak concentrations.
4. Discussion Figure 3. Postoperatively measured biomarkers, peak concentrations.
4. DisTcuhsissioannalysis of cardiac outcomes of a randomised controlled trial suggests that liraglutide might betteTrhipsraensaelryvsies mofycaorcdairadcioaultfcuonmcetsioonf aarfatnedr ocmaridseidaccosnutrrgoellreyd. tEricahl soucgagredsitosgthraatplhiriacgalustsiedsesmmiegnhtts revealed btehtatetrmporerseerpvaetimenyotscahraddialafnuoncrtmioanl aleftfetrvceanrdtriaiccusluarrgseyrys.toElcihcofcuanrdcitoiogrnapwhhicenastsreesasmteedntpsrreeovpeaelreadtively with tlhiraat gmluotriedpea,tcieonmtsphaardeda tnoorpmatailelnetfst vinentthriecupllaarcseybsotoglircofuupncitniown hwihchenmtroeraetepdaptireenoptserhaatidvealyrewdiuthced cardiac lfiurangclutitoidne,pcoosmtoppareerdattiovpealyti.enItns iandthdeitpiolanc,ebwoegroobusperinvewdhiacnh minocrreepaasteidenthsehaardt ararteeduincedlircaagrdluiatcide treated function postoperatively. In addition, we observed an increased heart rate in liraglutide treated ppaattieienntst,sb, ubtuntondoifdfeiffreenrceensciensmineamn eaartneraiartleprrieaslspurree.sOsuthree.r Omtahrkeerrms oafrskheorrst-otefrsmhocratr-dtiearcmfucnacrtdioinac function ssuucchhaassvavsaosaocaticvteiv/ine/oitnrooptrioc psuicppsuorptpoorrtleoverlsleovfeblsioomfabrkioerms asrekemeresdsueenmaffeedcteudnabffyepcrteeodpebryatipvreeoperative lliirraagglulutitdide etretraetmatemnet.nt.
SStutudideiseosnoGnLGPL-1Pi-n1diuncdeudcceadrdcioaprdroiotepctriootnecatrieolnimairtedli,manitdedal,l aunseddadllifufesreedntdcioffmebreinnatticoonms obfinations of ppaattieiennt tppopoupluatliaotniosn(ws i(twh ivtharivaabriliiatbyiilnitycairndicoavradsciouvlaarshceuallathr )h, einaclrteht)i,nininctreervtienntiinotnesrv(wenitthiodnifsfe(rwinigth differing GGLLPP-1-1rerceecpetoprtoargoangisotnicismtiecchmaneicshmasn) iasnmdsc)aradniadc coaurtdcoiamce o(uusticnogmvaeri(ouussinimgavgianrgiotuecshnimiqaugesinagndtechniques bainomd abrkioemrs)ar[6k]e. rOs)ur[6c]u. rrOenut rstcuudryredniftfesrtsufdroymdipffreevrsioufrsosmtudpireesvoionumsossttuodfiethsesoenamspoecstts.oMf athneyse aspects. pMreavnioyups restvuidoiuess satnuadlyiessedanpaaltyiesnedts pwatitihenitsschwaietmh iias-cinhdauemcedia-cinardduiaccedincjuarrydiaacfteinr jupreyrcaufttaenrepouesrcutaneous coronary interventions. GLP-1 infusion improved left ventricular ejection fraction determined by eccohroocnaradriyoginratpehrvyefnoltlioownisn.gGsuLcPce-1ssfiunlfupesriocuntainmepourosvcoerdonleafrtyvinetnetrrviecnutlioanr e(PjeCcIt)io[7n], farnadctiitornedduecetedrmined by leecfthvoecnatrrdiciuolgarradpyhsfyunfoctliloonwaifntegrsbuacllcoeosnsfouclclpuesriocunt[a8n].eIonuaslactoerrosntuadryy,iansteixr-vheonutrioexne(nPaCtidI)e[i7n]f,uasniodn it reduced alfetfetrvPeCnItrreidcuulcaerddinyfsafructnscitzieoonnacfatredribacamlloaognneoticccrleussoinoann[c8e]i.mInagainlgat[e1r4]s.tAuldsoy,, tawsiicxe-dhaoiulyreexxeennataitdiede infusion (aafGteLrPP-C1 Irerceedputocredagionnfaisrtc)tfosirz7e2ohnrceadrudcieadcimnfagrcntestiizceroensocnaradnicaec immaaggnientigc [r1e4so].nAanlcseo,imtwagicinegdaanildy exenatide c(aardGiaLcP-b1iormeacrekpetrorrealegaosne is[1t)5]f.orHo7w2 ehverre,dbuoctehdsitnudfaiersct osbiszeervoend cnaordfiuancctmioanganl edtifcferreesnocnesanince imaging eacnhdoccaardrdioigarcapbhioym[1a4r,1k5e]r. Wrehleilaeswe e[1d5i]d. fiHndowa ebvetetre,r beochthocsatruddioigersapohbiscefruvnecdtionnoinfutnhectliiorangallutdidiffeerences in gercohuopc,acrodmiopgarreadphtoy p[1la4c,e1b5o]., oWurhiploepwuleatdioidn ficonndsisatebdetotferpaetcihenotcsaurdndioegrgroaipnhgiccafrudniacctisounrgineryth, einliraglutide wgrhoicuhpt,hceomrepleaarseedotfobpiolamcaerbkoe,ros uisr pcaoupsuedlatmioonstclyonbsyisdteirdecotfspuartgiiecnatlsinujnudryertgootihneg ccaarrddiiaaccmsuursgcleer,y, in which ctohnetrraeslteeadsebyoifscbhioaemmairak-ienrdsuicsecdaruesleeadsemdousrtinlyg bPyCId. iIrneacdt dsuitirognic, ablioimnjaurrkyertoretlheaesecavradriieascamccuosrdclien,gcontrasted to the magnitude and number of surgical interventions. Based on the measurement of biomarkers of cbayrdiisacchianejumryia, -winedduecteedcterdelenaoseevdiduerninceg oPfCcIa.rdIniopardodteictitoionn, ibnioomurarsktuedr yr.elUenafsoertvuanraiteeslya, coctohredr ing to the tmecahgnniqiutueds eusaenddbnefuomre,bseurcohfassucragridciaalcimntaegrnveetnictiroesnosn. aBnacseeidmoagninthge, wmeereasuunraevmaielanbtleofinboioumr paartkieenrst of cardiac pinopjuurlya,tiwone ddueetetcotethdenroelieavnicdeeonncerooufticnaerdcliionpicraoltdeciatgionnositnicosuforrstthuedoyu. tUconmfoerotuf nthaitsesluy,bo-stthuedryt.echniques used before, such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, were unavailable in our patient population due to
the reliance on routine clinical diagnostics for the outcome of this sub-study.
Another difference with previous studies is the type of GLP-1 RA studied. While we performed
the first randomised trial using liraglutide in patients undergoing cardiac surgery [2], Besch et al.
randomised patients undergoing CABG to either a continuous exenatide infusion or insulin for
glycaemic control [16]. Similar to our present study, the authors performed an analysis of cardiac
outcomes and found no difference in postoperative troponin levels nor in the incidence of reduced left
ventricular ejection fraction between treatment and control groups [17]. Of note, the primary outcome
of this trial (time spent within the glycaemic target range) also did not reach a significant difference
between groups [16]. In contrast, liraglutide proved effective in improving glycaemic control during

J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 673

7 of 9

cardiac surgery in our patient population [2] and the current analysis also reveals a signal of improved cardiac outcomes.
Indications of beneficial effects on cardiac outcomes are not only based on preclinical data and the aforementioned studies of ischaemia-induced cardiac injury. Currently, indications of GLP-1 mediated cardioprotection are reinforced by the results from large cardiovascular outcome trials in patients with diabetes mellitus. In the LEADER trial, patients with diabetes mellitus randomised to receive liraglutide had lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death, compared to placebo [10]. Similarly, dulaglutide, another long-acting GLP-1 RA, reduced the composite incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death [11]. Haemodynamically, both trials observed an increase in heart rate and a reduction in mean arterial pressure in the intervention group. In the present study, the most statistically robust findings were also the higher heart rates observed in the liraglutide group. This effect has been consistently demonstrated in previous studies [16–19] and GLP-1 receptors have been found in the sinoatrial node [10,20,21]. Some authors have found GLP-1 RAs to induce vasodilation and microvascular recruitment, resulting in lower systemic vascular resistance [21] as well as an atrial natriuretic peptide-mediated reduction of systolic and diastolic blood pressures [4]. Although we found no differences in mean arterial pressure (with a concurrent increase in heart rate in the liraglutide group), the available data are insufficient to infer whether this is due to a reduction in systemic vascular resistance, cardiac preload or contractility.
Limitations
This study has some limitations: it is a secondary analysis of a randomised clinical trial. As such, results should be interpreted cautiously and only as supportive evidence of the hypothesis that GLP-1RA might improve cardiovascular outcomes after cardiac surgery. Secondly, outcomes were collected from echocardiographic, haemodynamic and laboratory data coming from routine clinical care, and therefore some parameters suffered from missing data. Specifically, follow-up of valve surgery more often included echocardiography, compared to CABG-only procedures. However, the cohorts of patients with and without postoperative echocardiography had comparable baseline characteristics. Thus, we deemed it unlikely that a significant bias influenced the decision of whether or not postoperative echocardiography was performed. Furthermore, while an echocardiographic study was performed in most patients postoperatively, only qualitative assessments of cardiac function were consistently reported, and more quantitative measurements were not available.
In conclusion, liraglutide administered before cardiac surgery modestly improved postoperative cardiac function. It altered immediate haemodynamics (increased heart rate) and better preserved left ventricular function on echocardiography at postoperative follow-up. This warrants further investigation of liraglutide in larger trials of cardiac surgery patients with a primary focus on postoperative cardiovascular outcomes.
Supplementary Materials: The following are available online at http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/3/673/s1.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, A.H.H., T.G.V.C., J.H.D. and J.H.; Data curation, A.H.H., M.J.V. and L.v.d.W.; Formal analysis, A.H.H. and J.H.; Funding acquisition, M.W.H., B.P. and J.H.; Investigation, A.H.H., M.J.V., L.v.d.W., M.B.G., B.T., B.M.G., T.V.S., R.A.B. and M.G.A.W.; Methodology, A.H.H., T.G.V.C., J.H.D. and J.H.; Project administration, A.H.H., M.J.V., B.P. and J.H.; Resources, M.W.H., J.H.D., B.P. and J.H.; Supervision, T.G.V.C., M.W.H., J.H.D., B.P. and J.H.; Validation, A.H.H.; Visualization, A.H.H.; Writing—original draft, A.H.H., M.J.V. and J.H.; Writing—review & editing, T.G.V.C., L.v.d.W., M.B.G., B.T., B.M.G., T.V.S., R.A.B., M.G.A.W., M.W.H., J.H.D. and B.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This investigator-initiated study was partly supported by a research grant from the Investigator-Initiated Studies Program of Novo Nordisk (Bagsvaerd, Denmark).
Acknowledgments: The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Novo Nordisk. Deidentified patients’ data can be requested by researchers for use in independent scientific research and will be provided following review and approval of the research proposal and completion of a data-sharing agreement with the University of Amsterdam. Data requests can be made any time after the publication of this trial for up to 5 years (extendable). Requests should be sent to the corresponding author.

J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 673

8 of 9

Conflicts of Interest: M.V., L.v.d.W., M.G., B.T., B.G., T.S. and M.W. have no conflicts to declare; A.H. and J.H. have received a grant from the European Society of Anesthesiology; A.B. acts as a consultant for Philips Research. M.H. is Executive Section Editor Pharmacology with Anesthesia & Analgesia, Section Editor Anesthesiology with Journal of Clinical Medicine, acted as a consultant for Eurocept and received research support from ZonMW, and lecture fees from BBraun, MSD and CSL Behring; B.P. has received research support from GE Healthcare, Edwards, Air Liquide; he has received lecture fees from Abbott, Abbvie, Orion Pharma, Philips Healthcare and grants from SCA, ESA, and ZonMW. H.D.V. has received research support from Sanofi and acts as a consultant for Novo Nordisk.
References
1. Hulst, A.H.; Plummer, M.P.; Hollmann, M.W.; Devries, J.H.; Preckel, B.; Deane, A.M.; Hermanides, J. Systematic review of incretin therapy during peri-operative and intensive care. Crit. Care 2018, 22, 1–12. [CrossRef]
2. Hulst, A.H.; Visscher, M.J.; Godfried, M.B.; Thiel, B.; Gerritse, B.M.; Scohy, T.V.; Bouwman, R.A.; Willemsen, M.G.A.; Hollmann, M.W.; Preckel, B.; et al. Liraglutide for perioperative management of hyperglycaemia in cardiac surgery patients: A multicentre randomized superiority trial. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 2019, 68, 1–9. [CrossRef]
3. Aravindhan, K.; Bao, W.; Harpel, M.R.; Willette, R.N.; Lepore, J.J.; Jucker, B.M. Cardioprotection resulting from glucagon-like peptide-1 administration involves shifting metabolic substrate utilization to increase energy efficiency in the rat heart. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, 1–18. [CrossRef]
4. Kim, M.; Platt, M.J.; Shibasaki, T.; Quaggin, S.E.; Backx, P.H.; Seino, S.; Simpson, J.A.; Drucker, D.J. GLP-1 receptor activation and Epac2 link atrial natriuretic peptide secretion to control of blood pressure. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 567–575. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Ravassa, S.; Zudaire, A.; Díez, J. GLP-1 and cardioprotection: From bench to bedside. Cardiovasc. Res. 2012, 94, 316–323. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
6. Giblett, J.P.; Clarke, S.J.; Dutka, D.P.; Hoole, S.P. Glucagon-Like Peptide-1: A Promising Agent for Cardioprotection during Myocardial Ischemia. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2016, 1, 267–276. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
7. Nikolaidis, L.A.; Mankad, S.; Sokos, G.G.; Miske, G.; Shah, A.; Elahi, D.; Shannon, R.P. Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Left Ventricular Dysfunction after Successful Reperfusion. Circulation 2004, 109, 962–965. [CrossRef]
8. Read, P.A.; Hoole, S.P.; White, P.A.; Khan, F.Z.; O’Sullivan, M.; West, N.E.; Dutka, D.P. A pilot study to assess whether glucagon-like peptide-1 protects the heart from ischemic dysfunction and attenuates stunning after coronary balloon occlusion in humans. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2011, 4, 266–272. [CrossRef]
9. Read, P.A.; Khan, F.Z.; Dutka, D.P. Cardioprotection against ischaemia induced by dobutamine stress using glucagon-like peptide-1 in patients with coronary artery disease. Heart 2012, 98, 408–413. [CrossRef]
10. Marso, S.P.; Daniels, G.H.; Brown-Frandsen, K.; Kristensen, P.; Mann, J.F.E.; Nauck, M.A.; Nissen, S.E.; Pocock, S.; Poulter, N.R.; Ravn, L.S.; et al. Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 311–322. [CrossRef]
11. Gerstein, H.C.; Colhoun, H.M.; Dagenais, G.R.; Diaz, R.; Lakshmanan, M.; Pais, P.; Probstfield, J.; Riesmeyer, J.S.; Riddle, M.C.; Rydén, L.; et al. Dulaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (REWIND): A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2019, 394, 121–130. [CrossRef]
12. Hulst, A.H.; Visscher, M.J.; Godfried, M.B.; Thiel, B.; Gerritse, B.M.; Scohy, T.V.; Bouwman, R.A.; Willemsen, M.G.A.; Hollmann, M.W.; Devries, J.H.; et al. Study protocol of the randomised placebo-controlled GLOBE trial: GLP-1 for bridging of hyperglycaemia during cardiac surgery. BMJ Open 2018, 8, 1–6. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Schulz, K.F.; Altman, D.G.; Moher, D. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010, 340, 698–702. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
14. Lønborg, J.; Kelbæk, H.; Vejlstrup, N.; Bøtker, H.E.; Kim, W.Y.; Holmvang, L.; Jørgensen, E.; Helqvist, S.; Saunamäki, K.; Terkelsen, C.J.; et al. Exenatide reduces final infarct size in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and short-duration of ischemia. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2012, 5, 288–295. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 673

9 of 9

15. Woo, J.S.; Kim, W.; Ha, S.J.; Kim, J.B.; Kim, S.-J.; Kim, W.-S.; Seon, H.J.; Kim, K.S. Cardioprotective Effects of Exenatide in Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2013, 33, 2252–2260. [CrossRef]
16. Besch, G.; Perrotti, A.; Mauny, F.; Puyraveau, M.; Baltres, M.; Flicoteaux, G.; Du Mont, L.S.; Barrucand, B.; Samain, E.; Chocron, S.; et al. Clinical Effectiveness of Intravenous Exenatide Infusion in Perioperative Glycemic Control after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Anesthesiology 2017, 127, 775–787. [CrossRef]
17. Besch, G.; Perrotti, A.; Du Mont, L.S.; Puyraveau, M.; Ben-Said, X.; Baltres, M.; Barrucand, B.; Flicoteaux, G.; Vettoretti, L.; Samain, E.; et al. Impact of intravenous exenatide infusion for perioperative blood glucose control on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injuries after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Sub study of the phase II/III ExSTRESS randomized trial. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2018, 17, 140. [CrossRef]
18. Holman, R.R.; Bethel, M.A.; Mentz, R.J.; Thompson, V.P.; Lokhnygina, Y.; Buse, J.B.; Chan, J.C.; Choi, J.; Gustavson, S.M.; Iqbal, N.; et al. Effects of Once-Weekly Exenatide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 1228–1239. [CrossRef]
19. Pfeffer, M.A.; Claggett, B.; Diaz, R.; Dickstein, K.; Gerstein, H.C.; Køber, L.V.; Lawson, F.C.; Ping, L.; Wei, X.; Lewis, E.F.; et al. Lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 2247–2257. [CrossRef]
20. Drucker, D.J.; Nauck, M.A. The incretin system: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet 2006, 368, 1696–1705. [CrossRef]
21. Muskiet, M.H.A.; Tonneijck, L.; Smits, M.M.; Van Baar, M.J.; Kramer, M.H.H.; Hoorn, E.J.; Joles, J.A.; Van Raalte, D.H. GLP-1 and the kidney: From physiology to pharmacology and outcomes in diabetes. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2017, 13, 605–628. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
SurgeryPatientsLiraglutideFunctionCrossref